위 순위 산정방법

홈 > 커뮤니티 > 그냥암꺼나
그냥암꺼나
- 예의를 지켜주세요 / 여행관련 질문은 묻고답하기에 / 연애·태국인출입국관련 글 금지

- 국내외 정치사회(이슈,문제)등과 관련된 글은 정치/사회 게시판에 

그냥암꺼나2

위 순위 산정방법

tt 0 477
주제넘은 짓인지는 모르겠으나, 개인적으로 궁금해서, (서양여행자와 서양배낭여행자의 차이는 무엇일까?에서 시작된 의문..)
위 2가지 설문조사 순위 산정한 방식에 대해서 읽어보고, 10~30위 표도 퍼올려고 했는데, 이상하게 칸이 많이 벌어져서 그건 포기했습니다.

저처럼 궁금하신 분들, 참고하세요~.
제가 읽어보니까, 배낭여행자 순위는 설문조사를 받아서 만들었고,
또 한가지의 criteria 순위는 항목별로 나누어서 사이트 운영자 주관이 많이 개입되어서 만들었고,
이것을 수치화 시켜서 합/평균을 내어서 "global mark"라는 것을 만들었는데,
그에 따른 순위라네요.
그러니까, 일반순위는 설문조사한 것 + 운영자 주관을 합쳐서 만든 순위인 것 같네요~
그리고, 배낭여행자 순위만 낼 때는 5명 이하가 응답한 지역은 제외되었구요.
(제 독해로는 그렇네요^^;)

1) The localities global mark ?

For each locality, an average was made between the criteria ratings and the travelers' ratings. A ranking was then established between the localities presented...

Note : recapitulative tables of these localities' ratings can be consulted at the sections "Where to go" of each country.

2) The localities backpackers' ratings ?

Backpackers are asked to rate each locality they visited from 1 to 20, the higher being the best.

The number of people surveyed appears in bracket : the more surveyed, the less subjectivity for the total rate. Some localities have however only one respondent ! Help us gain objectivity by completing the locality survey : Participate !

3) The localities ratings by criteria ?
This rating is done by ourselves and is therefore subjective. Indeed, only someone with a global vision of a country (that is someone who visited all the localities) could try to establish a rating. We introduced various criteria :

-Charm : the global urbanism attractiveness of an area. This is some rather ugly towns can get a good rate : they are the transit points to charming surroundings villages.

-Scenery : the natural charm of an area

-Parks : a criteria for the cities only

-Culture : the cultural opportunities of an area : monuments, temples, caves, museums, festivals...

-Minorities : the interests & friendliness offered by the local minorities

-Markets : interest of the local markets

-Relaxation : the possibility to leave the crowd and spend hours by oneself in a dreamable surrounding.

-Fiesta : either the ability to have fun with other backpackers or the possibility to go out & join the locals.

-Cheap : the cost of basic accomodation, food and local sights...

As you have noticed, some criteria apply only to cities (parks) while others apply more to countryside (scenery). This is why, in general, the rating of a locality rarely goes very high : a city has got nice parks but no natural scenery for example.

Still, we took all the criteria into account to establish the rating. We established a rate from 1 to 5, the higher the best, for each criteria. The total is then divided by the number of criteria (9) and multiplied by 4 to get a rate out of 20.

( 아래 link는 나머지 20순위에 대한 표입니다. 이해를 쉽게 하는 것 같네요.
원래는 요왕님께서 위에 올리신 것처럼 표를 퍼올려고 했는데, 저는 이상하게 간격이 너무 많이 벌어져서
글 목록 보는데 민폐를 끼치는 것 같아 그냥 link를 붙입니다;)


http://www.passplanet.com/Thailand/the_following_20.htm

참! 그리고, 위의 criteria 순위중 scenery 항목을 보면

Best of Scenery :: The following localities all received the maximum grade (5) for their scenery

Kanchanaburi
Mae Salong
Soppong / Tham Lod
Sang Khom
Ko Pha Ngan
Tha Ton
A Hong
Mukdahan
Ko Lanta
Ko Tao
Krabi
Phuket
Ko Chang
Khao Sok
Ko Samui

라고 되어 있네요~^^
0 Comments
제목